Mickey 17 Review โ Robert Pattinson Shines While Bong Joon Ho Whiffs
โMickey 17โ, Bong Joon Hoโs sequel to the Oscar-winning โParasiteโ, is riddled with death, often occurring in disturbing and mundane manners. It attempts to tackle current socio-political issues through satire and high style, but lacks the captivating tone and tension of its predecessor. However, Robert Pattinsonโs performance brings a twist of eccentricity that may keep you intrigued.

โ โMickey 17โ is a follow-up to Bong Joon Hoโs Oscar-winning thriller โParasite,โ starring Robert Pattinson as a character who constantly dies and is reborn on a distant ice planet. This dystopian narrative showcases themes of economic disparity, environmental destruction, and authoritarianism.
โ Pattinsonโs character, Mickey, has multiple versions, each with different personalities, creating interesting dynamics in the film. However, director Bongโs storytelling technique generally lacks the intensity and precision of his previous works.
โ Despite featuring seamless special effects and striking dystopian cinematography, โMickey 17โโs subplots become too complex, resulting in a scattered narrative that could use better execution.
South Korean director Bong Joon Ho, known for tackling themes of economic disparities, environmental destruction, and authoritarianism in his past works โOkjaโ and โSnowpiercer,โ offers a disappointing follow-up to his award-winning thriller โParasiteโ with his third English-language film, โMickey 17.โ
The plot follows an โExpendableโ named Mickey Barnes, played by Robert Pattinson, who repeatedly dies in gruesome and mundane fashion on a distant icy planet 30 years in the future. Mickey is essentially used as a guinea pig for colonizers of the new world, getting killed off only to be reproduced and reborn with his memory intact.
Pattinsonโs performance is a standout, his playful derangement offering a reprieve from the heavy-handed themes and uneven narrative of the movie. The film is based on the 2022 sci-fi novel Mickey7 by Edward Ashton and delves into familiar territory for Bong Joon Ho. It also explores new concepts in the form of having two versions of Mickey, creating an interesting dynamic.
However, where โMickey 17โ falls flat is its convoluted subplots and overuse of narration, which unnecessarily complicates the world-building. Bong Joon Hoโs typically razor-sharp satire is awkwardly executed, making the filmโs messages about immigration and colonization more grating than impactful.
The overall production design is a high point, offering a visual feast of dystopian landscapes while maintaining an air of gloom that suits the narrative. However, subplots involving an attempted coup and the inclusion of โcreepersโ โ creatures that are a part of the alien landscape โ drag and ultimately detract from the central plot.
Mark Ruffaloโs character, Kenneth Marshall, who is the conceited tyrant in charge, and his wife, Ylfa, played by Toni Collette, are over-the-top caricatures, providing comical relief but ultimately growing tiresome.
Given Bong Joon Hoโs past achievements, one might expect โMickey 17โ to be a thrilling exploration of pertinent issues with his signature flair. Sadly, Bongโs touch is lost amid clumsy narrative choices, leaving โMickey 17โ as a disappointing endeavor, despite an inspired performance from Pattinson.
Overall, those left yearning for a return to Bong Joon Hoโs usual mastery of tone and tension, will find themselves still waiting with in this latest offering. Albeit an ambitious project, โMickey 17โ fails to build upon the promise of its initial concept and ultimately feels like a missed opportunity.
RATING: 2 out of 5 stars.
Mickey 17 is in theaters, March 7th, 2025.