New Harry Potter Won’t Be A New York Times Best-Seller
And here’s why:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-giltz/why-harry-potter_b_57099.html
UPDATE: if that link doesn’t work, try the cached version by clicking HERE.
And here’s why:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-giltz/why-harry-potter_b_57099.html
UPDATE: if that link doesn’t work, try the cached version by clicking HERE.
OpenCritic
been removed
i added the link to the GOogle cached version. interesting article about the NYT classifying the Potter series as “children’s books” and therefore ineligible, and the impact that would have had if that were true years ago (on His Dark Materials, Bridge to Terabithia, and Harry Potter himself).