<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indy at $126M for 5 day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2008/05/25/indy-at-126m-for-5-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2008/05/25/indy-at-126m-for-5-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 18:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eros Welker</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2008/05/25/indy-at-126m-for-5-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Eros Welker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=388#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You&#8217;re right, that was from Thursday through Sunday, actually.&#160; Still, I&#8217;m not really complaining, but that the 4th Indy flick, after 19 years of anticipation, is still performing less than Spider-Man 3 makes me sad (and I liked Spider-Man 3!).&#160; Heck, Shrek the Third did better than Indy in 4 days.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of course, this is all water under the bridge; of course it&#8217;s a hit, and someone right now is plotting a green-lightable, yet nonsensical draft for #5.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, that was from Thursday through Sunday, actually.&nbsp; Still, I&#8217;m not really complaining, but that the 4th Indy flick, after 19 years of anticipation, is still performing less than Spider-Man 3 makes me sad (and I liked Spider-Man 3!).&nbsp; Heck, Shrek the Third did better than Indy in 4 days.</p>
<p>Of course, this is all water under the bridge; of course it&#8217;s a hit, and someone right now is plotting a green-lightable, yet nonsensical draft for #5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Ass</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2008/05/25/indy-at-126m-for-5-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Ass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 06:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=388#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, it&#8217;s going to be $151 million for 5 days. That $126 million is only Friday-Monday. And it&#8217;s second best of all time Memorial Day weekends, hard to complain.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s going to be $151 million for 5 days. That $126 million is only Friday-Monday. And it&#8217;s second best of all time Memorial Day weekends, hard to complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

