Reviewed Before Viewed


Written by:

  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

No Responses to “Reviewed Before Viewed”

  1. Burnt says:


  2. junky says:

    LOL, saw it.  If this movie came out in 1990 we would have liked it.  It is not 1990.  This movie needed no dialogue, better casting, better effects, and anyone but Roland Emmerich.  That said, it was not as gut-wrenchingly awful as I’d expected.  It was just dull and uninspired.  I stand by the face I made.

    Which, for the record, is the first picture I’ve seen of myself that made me feel like I was approaching middle-age.  Thank God I stopped smoking.  Wish I never started.

  3. cybergosh says:

    1. This was the first time in history i wish i could have STPPED you from going out to the theater.

    2. I don’t think you look that old.

    3. Yes about the smoking.  Bad.

  4. Battlestar Tiffactica says:

    I’ve found my new desktop wallpaper pic!!

  5. Eros Welker says:

    I’m surprised you could stomach Mr. Magorium’s Wonder Emporium, but couldn’t make it through this.  This is harmless, and if anything, filmmakers should study this as an exercise towards what NOT to do when making a movie like this. 

    I stand by that, if this movie were cut significantly, with some digi-cuts and dubbing around the dialog to make it look like they’re talking in tongues so that it could be sub-titled, that it could have been a decent movie.  Maybe when I’m bored out of my mind, trapped in my LA apartment, I’ll take that on!