New Harry Potter Won’t Be A New York Times Best-Seller

Posted in News and Features
23Jul

And here’s why:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-giltz/why-harry-potter_b_57099.html

UPDATE: if that link doesn’t work, try the cached version by clicking HERE.

Tags:

Written by:

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

No Responses to “New Harry Potter Won’t Be A New York Times Best-Seller”

  1. Bake Snaker says:
    July 23, 2007 at 6:45 am

    been removed

  2. Eros Welker says:
    July 23, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    i added the link to the GOogle cached version.  interesting article about the NYT classifying the Potter series as “children’s books” and therefore ineligible, and the impact that would have had if that were true years ago (on His Dark Materials, Bridge to Terabithia, and Harry Potter himself).

Advertising