New Harry Potter Won’t Be A New York Times Best-Seller

And here’s why:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-giltz/why-harry-potter_b_57099.html

UPDATE: if that link doesn’t work, try the cached version by clicking HERE.

Tags:

Written by:

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

No Responses to “New Harry Potter Won’t Be A New York Times Best-Seller”

  1. Bake Snaker says:

    been removed

  2. Eros Welker says:

    i added the link to the GOogle cached version.  interesting article about the NYT classifying the Potter series as “children’s books” and therefore ineligible, and the impact that would have had if that were true years ago (on His Dark Materials, Bridge to Terabithia, and Harry Potter himself).

Advertising