<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Junky&#8217;s Review &#8211; Living Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/06/28/junkys-review-living-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/06/28/junkys-review-living-free/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 18:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: junky</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/06/28/junkys-review-living-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>junky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=904#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It was more lackluster on PC, but I owned both die hard trilogy and the sequel (die hard trilogy 2!)   Never was big on the driving sequences for Die Hard III but the first two were great.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
My unsung favorite was DIE HARD for the nintendo.&#160;  You had to traverse EVERY FLOOR of the Nakatomi building, and always had to backtrack to gain access to new areas using keycards or sneaking through vents, etc.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It was like the original Wolfenstein games, had stealth and action aspects, multiple ways to approach obstacles.&#160;  Very clever.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This game was INSANELY challenging.&#160;  I played it over and over.&#160;  It had a top-down view on the action and you would spray your machine gun bullets and control their direction.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I really loved it -shoulda called it PLAY HARD, cuz it was.&#160;  Never been prouder of completing a game in my life.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was more lackluster on PC, but I owned both die hard trilogy and the sequel (die hard trilogy 2!)   Never was big on the driving sequences for Die Hard III but the first two were great.</p>
<p>My unsung favorite was DIE HARD for the nintendo.&nbsp;  You had to traverse EVERY FLOOR of the Nakatomi building, and always had to backtrack to gain access to new areas using keycards or sneaking through vents, etc.</p>
<p>It was like the original Wolfenstein games, had stealth and action aspects, multiple ways to approach obstacles.&nbsp;  Very clever.</p>
<p>This game was INSANELY challenging.&nbsp;  I played it over and over.&nbsp;  It had a top-down view on the action and you would spray your machine gun bullets and control their direction.</p>
<p>I really loved it -shoulda called it PLAY HARD, cuz it was.&nbsp;  Never been prouder of completing a game in my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Ass</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/06/28/junkys-review-living-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Ass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=904#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Die Hard Trilogy for PS1 is phenomenal, especially if you happen to have a light gun. one of the best PS1 games ever made, actually.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Die Hard Trilogy for PS1 is phenomenal, especially if you happen to have a light gun. one of the best PS1 games ever made, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Ass</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/06/28/junkys-review-living-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Ass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=904#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This movie was like Rocky Balboa-- not the movie, but the character. I wanted to hate it and kept beating it up, and it just kept getting back up and taking more beating until it won me over. I didn&#8217;t like the dialogue, thought the acting was phoned in, thought the script was paper thin (pun not worthy) and there was nowhere near enough good ol&#8217; fashioned dialogue and way, way too many shots of hands on keyboards.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
And yet the inventive action scenes, which were fast, exciting, surprisingly well designed and integrated into the story and shockingly well filmed, won me over time and again.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thought I&#8217;d despise this film and want to tear my eyes out when Kevin Smith appeared, and actually I was fairly even keeled, maybe even leaning toward liking the film and barely offended by Smith. Despite every inclination I had beforehand, I gotta say I think the movie is worth seeing.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Someone call these guys and explain to them the theory of a character arc, though.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie was like Rocky Balboa&#8211; not the movie, but the character. I wanted to hate it and kept beating it up, and it just kept getting back up and taking more beating until it won me over. I didn&#8217;t like the dialogue, thought the acting was phoned in, thought the script was paper thin (pun not worthy) and there was nowhere near enough good ol&#8217; fashioned dialogue and way, way too many shots of hands on keyboards.</p>
<p>And yet the inventive action scenes, which were fast, exciting, surprisingly well designed and integrated into the story and shockingly well filmed, won me over time and again.</p>
<p>Thought I&#8217;d despise this film and want to tear my eyes out when Kevin Smith appeared, and actually I was fairly even keeled, maybe even leaning toward liking the film and barely offended by Smith. Despite every inclination I had beforehand, I gotta say I think the movie is worth seeing.</p>
<p>Someone call these guys and explain to them the theory of a character arc, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junktape</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/06/28/junkys-review-living-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Junktape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=904#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I meant DVD.&#160; Or if a bunch of friends wanted to see it and I already did, I wouldn&#8217;t protest.&#160;  But I meant DVD.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant DVD.&nbsp; Or if a bunch of friends wanted to see it and I already did, I wouldn&#8217;t protest.&nbsp;  But I meant DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eros Welker</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/06/28/junkys-review-living-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Eros Welker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=904#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#8217;s a real good point about Hostage.&#160; That really should have been DH4.&#160; There will be another Die Hard game, I&#8217;m sure of it, and hopefully it will be GOOD. &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/images/smileys/wink.gif&quot; width=&quot;19&quot; height=&quot;19&quot; alt=&quot;wink&quot; style=&quot;border:0;&quot; /&gt;  I&#8217;m surprised you&#8217;d see this flick again&#8212;or do you mean you&#8217;d see it again on DVD?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a real good point about Hostage.&nbsp; That really should have been DH4.&nbsp; There will be another Die Hard game, I&#8217;m sure of it, and hopefully it will be GOOD.   I&#8217;m surprised you&#8217;d see this flick again&#8212;or do you mean you&#8217;d see it again on DVD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybergosh</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/06/28/junkys-review-living-free/comment-page-1/#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybergosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 17:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=904#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I envy your experience!&#160; I wanted nothing more to feel the way you did, but, alas, it is something i can never do.&#160; I don&#8217;t hate it though.&#160; It just goes into the T3 folder of sequels i choose to pretend do not exist.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I envy your experience!&nbsp; I wanted nothing more to feel the way you did, but, alas, it is something i can never do.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t hate it though.&nbsp; It just goes into the T3 folder of sequels i choose to pretend do not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

