<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curse of the Golden Flower, Shampoo, I Heart Huckabees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/04/24/curse-of-the-golden-flower-shampoo-i-heart-huckabees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/04/24/curse-of-the-golden-flower-shampoo-i-heart-huckabees/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 18:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Junktape</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/04/24/curse-of-the-golden-flower-shampoo-i-heart-huckabees/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Junktape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=1025#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Ass on Asses&#8221;?&#160;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;Butt Seriously: The Opinions of Bake Snaker?&#8221;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#8220;Assrested Developments: Mature reviews with a Juvenille twist&#8221;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ass on Asses&#8221;?&nbsp;</p>
<p>&#8220;Butt Seriously: The Opinions of Bake Snaker?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Assrested Developments: Mature reviews with a Juvenille twist&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bake Snaker</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/04/24/curse-of-the-golden-flower-shampoo-i-heart-huckabees/comment-page-1/#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>Bake Snaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=1025#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I need a name for my reviews that include a mention to ass..cause from now on all my reviews will mention the quality of ass on screen&#8230; any suggestions?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I need a name for my reviews that include a mention to ass..cause from now on all my reviews will mention the quality of ass on screen&#8230; any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junktape</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/04/24/curse-of-the-golden-flower-shampoo-i-heart-huckabees/comment-page-1/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>Junktape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=1025#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thoughtful and detailed insights (into ass) as always.&#160; Why don&#8217;t you get more comments?&#160; It boggles the mind.&#160;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Seriously, I watched Shampoo a few years ago since it was on my must list and I think this is just one of those movies that arent timeless.&#160;  It had a certain impact at the time due to its sexual openness and frankness - it was refreshing and controversial.&#160; People really sat up and took notice, it had a generational voice.&#160;  But from our perspective it just has absolutely nothing to offer.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I didn&#8217;t heart huckabees but I found it interesting and engaging enough that I saw it twice.&#160;  I agree that it spends way too much time exploring itself, though the dense dialogue is fascinating to keep up with.&#160;  I much preferred Hoffman in Stranger Than Fiction, where he plays a similar role but (and this can be seen as better OR worse) is much simplified.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Huckabees is exceedingly original, which means I like it, despite its entertanment value being (overall) quite low.&#160;  Great performances by all involved, and a memorable movie.&#160;  But again, not one for the ages.&#160;  Just leaves you feeling cold.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Makes me want to see Flirting with Disaster again.&#160;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I will check out Curse of the Golden flower.&#160;  Though the star wars prequels suck in many ways, I was also impressed to see (through documentaries) just how much of Lucas&#8217; sets were indeed real and not digital --- I&#8217;d assumed that Lucas did EVERYTHING CGI when in fact, he did not.&#160;  But ironically he lit everything so uniformly (perhaps to make the blend with CGI easier) that even the REAL sets had a 2D look.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful and detailed insights (into ass) as always.&nbsp; Why don&#8217;t you get more comments?&nbsp; It boggles the mind.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Seriously, I watched Shampoo a few years ago since it was on my must list and I think this is just one of those movies that arent timeless.&nbsp;  It had a certain impact at the time due to its sexual openness and frankness &#8211; it was refreshing and controversial.&nbsp; People really sat up and took notice, it had a generational voice.&nbsp;  But from our perspective it just has absolutely nothing to offer.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t heart huckabees but I found it interesting and engaging enough that I saw it twice.&nbsp;  I agree that it spends way too much time exploring itself, though the dense dialogue is fascinating to keep up with.&nbsp;  I much preferred Hoffman in Stranger Than Fiction, where he plays a similar role but (and this can be seen as better OR worse) is much simplified.</p>
<p>Huckabees is exceedingly original, which means I like it, despite its entertanment value being (overall) quite low.&nbsp;  Great performances by all involved, and a memorable movie.&nbsp;  But again, not one for the ages.&nbsp;  Just leaves you feeling cold.</p>
<p>Makes me want to see Flirting with Disaster again.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I will check out Curse of the Golden flower.&nbsp;  Though the star wars prequels suck in many ways, I was also impressed to see (through documentaries) just how much of Lucas&#8217; sets were indeed real and not digital &#8212; I&#8217;d assumed that Lucas did EVERYTHING CGI when in fact, he did not.&nbsp;  But ironically he lit everything so uniformly (perhaps to make the blend with CGI easier) that even the REAL sets had a 2D look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

