Comments on: BergViews Catch Up http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/02/19/bergviews-catch-up/ Sat, 05 May 2012 18:19:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: junky http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/02/19/bergviews-catch-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1049 junky Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:01:47 +0000 http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=1206#comment-1049 <p>wow LeBouf rumor, probably true.  probably true.  River Phoenix where are you when we need you. </p> <p> Actually I like LeBouf, I just dont know if I like the idea of indy’s son. </p> <p> But sure, if they’re lookin to deal with the concept of age (hey, Kirk had a (gay) son in Khan) then this is likely the place to go.  Not to mention setting the scene for Ford-less sequels. </p> <p> Hey, it’s all about the script.  Any of these things can theoretically work.  ...so long as they work. <br /> d </p> wow LeBouf rumor, probably true.  probably true.  River Phoenix where are you when we need you.

Actually I like LeBouf, I just dont know if I like the idea of indy’s son.

But sure, if they’re lookin to deal with the concept of age (hey, Kirk had a (gay) son in Khan) then this is likely the place to go.  Not to mention setting the scene for Ford-less sequels.

Hey, it’s all about the script.  Any of these things can theoretically work.  …so long as they work.

d

]]> By: Cybergosh http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/02/19/bergviews-catch-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1048 Cybergosh Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:44:40 +0000 http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=1206#comment-1048 <p>you’re not clickin’ your links, bake.  you’re not clickin your links. </p> you’re not clickin’ your links, bake.  you’re not clickin your links.

]]> By: Bake Snaker http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2007/02/19/bergviews-catch-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1047 Bake Snaker Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:23:18 +0000 http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=1206#comment-1047 <p>What is that 6th film? </p> What is that 6th film?

]]>