<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awesome &#8220;New&#8221; Star Trek TV Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2006/08/31/awesome-new-star-trek-tv-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2006/08/31/awesome-new-star-trek-tv-series/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2006/08/31/awesome-new-star-trek-tv-series/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=1617#comment-392</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing this, but new special effects aside, is anyone else going to bother watching a 30-year old TV show?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
(Besides us, that is.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I wonder what they&#8217;re going to do to spruce up good episodes that don&#8217;t rely so heavily on effects, like City on the Edge of Forever and Amok Time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I also don&#8217;t really see how they&#8217;re going to make the original footage look right in HD format without cutting stuff out (or having to fabricate new stuff).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But what the hell do I know?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing this, but new special effects aside, is anyone else going to bother watching a 30-year old TV show?</p>
<p>(Besides us, that is.)</p>
<p>I wonder what they&#8217;re going to do to spruce up good episodes that don&#8217;t rely so heavily on effects, like City on the Edge of Forever and Amok Time.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t really see how they&#8217;re going to make the original footage look right in HD format without cutting stuff out (or having to fabricate new stuff).</p>
<p>But what the hell do I know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chekov</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/2006/08/31/awesome-new-star-trek-tv-series/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Chekov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainmentgeekly.com/test/?p=1617#comment-391</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#8217;s sooo cool, Brewster!&#160; But what channel? I couldn&#8217;t figure it out from the article.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s sooo cool, Brewster!&nbsp; But what channel? I couldn&#8217;t figure it out from the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

